‘Grotesque greed’: UN chief Guterres slams oil and gas companies | Oil and Gas News

UN Secretary-Basic Antonio Guterres urges governments to tax oil and gasoline firms’ income amid the vitality disaster.

United Nations Secretary-Basic Antonio Guterres slammed the “grotesque greed” of oil and gasoline firms and their monetary backers and urged governments globally to “tax these extreme income” to help probably the most susceptible individuals.

“It’s immoral for oil and gasoline firms to be making document income from this vitality disaster on the backs of the poorest individuals and communities, at an enormous value to the local weather,” Guterres instructed reporters on Wednesday.

The 2 largest United States oil firms – Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp – plus British-based Shell and France’s TotalEnergies mixed earned practically $51bn in the newest quarter, nearly double what the group introduced in for the year-ago interval.

“I urge all governments to tax these extreme income, and use the funds to help probably the most susceptible individuals by means of these tough instances,” Guterres mentioned.

“And I urge individuals all over the place to ship a transparent message to the fossil gasoline business and their financiers: that this grotesque greed is punishing the poorest and most susceptible individuals, whereas destroying our solely widespread dwelling,” he mentioned.

Politicians and client advocates have criticised the oil firms for capitalising on a worldwide provide scarcity to fatten income and gouge shoppers. US President Joe Biden mentioned in June that Exxon and others have been making “more cash than God” at a time when client gasoline costs surged to information.

Final month, Britain handed a 25 % windfall tax on oil and gasoline producers within the North Sea. US lawmakers have mentioned an analogous concept, although it faces lengthy odds in Congress.

Guterres mentioned Russia’s warfare in Ukraine and the local weather breakdown have been stoking a worldwide meals, vitality and finance disaster.

“Many growing international locations – drowning in debt, with out entry to finance, and struggling to get better from the COVID-19 pandemic – may go over the brink,” he mentioned. “We’re already seeing the warning indicators of a wave of financial, social and political upheaval that would depart no nation untouched.”

Cuba slams US ‘involvement’ on anniversary of anti-gov’t protests | Protests News

Cuba’s overseas minister has accused the USA of being concerned in efforts to “subvert regulation and order” within the nation after President Joe Biden’s administration welcomed the braveness of Cuban protesters who took to the streets final 12 months in uncommon anti-government demonstrations.

In a press release on Monday marking the one-year anniversary of the Cuban protests, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken mentioned Washington “have a good time[s] the Cuban individuals and commend[s] their indomitable dedication within the face of oppression”.

“To the Cuban individuals: People watched with admiration on July 11, 2021 as tens of 1000’s of you took to the streets to boost your voices for human rights, elementary freedoms, and a greater life. And we stand with you because the Cuban regime, as an alternative of welcoming the voices of the individuals, has condemned a whole lot of protestors to decades-long jail sentences,” Blinken mentioned.

Cuban Overseas Minister Bruno Rodriguez shot again on Twitter, saying Havana rejected Blinken’s feedback “confirming direct involvement of presidency of that nation in makes an attempt to subvert order and peace in #Cuba in violation of Worldwide Regulation”.

Hundreds of Cubans took to the streets within the capital Havana and different cities on July 11, 2021, in protest over rising meals prices, medical shortages and dire socio-economic circumstances that worsened through the COVID-19 pandemic.

A number of the protesters took direct intention on the authorities of President Miguel Diaz-Canel, chanting “down with the dictatorship” and “we would like liberty.” The all-but-unheard-of demonstrations rocked the Caribbean nation, the place authorities launched a mass crackdown on members.

“In the course of the protests, and within the weeks following them, the authorities arbitrarily detained a whole lot of individuals with out informing their households of their whereabouts, saved activists and unbiased journalists beneath excessive surveillance and lower off the inhabitants’s web entry,” Amnesty Worldwide mentioned in a factsheet on Monday marking the anniversary.

“A 12 months in the past right this moment, 1000’s of Cubans protested, demanding rights and freedoms, however the authorities gave a lot of them solely two choices: jail or exile,” Juan Pappier, a senior Americas researcher at Human Rights Watch, additionally mentioned in a press release. “Governments in Latin America and Europe ought to urgently escalate their human rights scrutiny over Cuba and prioritize a concerted, multilateral response earlier than this human rights disaster turns into even worse.”

Havana has accused Washington of sowing discontent amongst Cuban residents and instigating the protests, whereas additionally pointing to the decades-old US embargo towards the island as the principle issue hurting the nation’s economic system.

In January, the Cuban authorities acknowledged that greater than 700 individuals, together with youngsters, confronted prison costs in relation to the protests, together with “acts of vandalism, which [were] tried towards authorities, individuals and property, and extreme disruptions of public order”.

Final month, almost 400 individuals have been sanctioned for taking part within the demonstrations. Of that, 297 individuals have been sentenced to between 5 and 25 years in jail for crimes of sedition, sabotage, theft with pressure, and public dysfunction, the lawyer common’s workplace mentioned.

In April, the US and Cuba held their highest-level talks since a extreme disruption in ties through the Trump administration, discussing the urgent problem of migration, and the Biden authorities in mid-Could introduced it could ease some restrictions towards the nation.

However US criticism of the Cuban authorities’s response to the protests, and continued persecution of demonstrators, continues to be a significant sticking level between the 2 nations.

On Saturday, the US State Division introduced visa restrictions towards 28 Cuban officers that it mentioned have been implicated within the crackdown on protests final 12 months.

In a press release, the division mentioned the restrictions would apply to high-ranking members of the Cuban Communist Occasion and officers who work within the nation’s state communications and media sectors.

Rodriguez, the Cuban overseas minister, blasted the US measures and coverage in the direction of Cuba. “In view of failed try to impress fashionable rebellion in Cuba in 2021, the US authorities and its Secretary of State are searching for to discredit individuals’s victory over imperialist aggression,” he said.

Prince Charles slams UK plan to send refugees to Rwanda: Reports | Human Rights News

British media says Charles referred to as UK’s Rwanda asylum scheme ‘appalling’ and worries it is going to have an effect on Commonwealth summit.

Prince Charles has privately described the British authorities’s plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda as “appalling”, two media stories mentioned, as the primary flight taking refugees to the East African nation is because of go away subsequent week.

Charles, inheritor to the British throne, has been heard criticising the coverage, The Instances and Each day Mail newspapers reported.

He’s reportedly involved that the controversial asylum coverage will overshadow a Commonwealth summit in Rwanda the place he is because of symbolize his mom Queen Elizabeth on the finish of this month, The Instances reported.

“He mentioned he was greater than disillusioned on the coverage,” a supply instructed The Instances.

“He mentioned he thinks the federal government’s complete method is appalling. It was clear he was not impressed with the federal government’s path of journey.”

A spokesperson for Charles didn’t deny he had expressed private opinions concerning the coverage in personal.

“We’d not touch upon supposed nameless personal conversations with the Prince besides to restate that he stays politically impartial. Issues of coverage are selections for presidency,” the spokesperson mentioned.

The British authorities introduced in April it had struck a deal to ship doubtlessly tens of hundreds of asylum seekers to Rwanda in a bid to undermine people-smuggling networks.

As much as 130 asylum seekers have been notified they may very well be despatched to Rwanda and attorneys for nearly 100 had submitted authorized challenges asking to remain within the UK. Not less than 30 people are nonetheless set to be faraway from the nation subsequent week.

The federal government overcame a authorized problem to the coverage on Friday as a decide dismissed campaigners’ makes an attempt to win an injunction. It mentioned the primary flight may go away on Tuesday.

The courtroom additionally granted permission for human rights teams to enchantment the choice – a transfer anticipated to happen on Monday.

Beneath the UK’s unwritten structure, the royal household ought to stay politically impartial. Queen Elizabeth has steadfastly saved her opinions to herself throughout her seven-decade reign.

Charles, in distinction, has expressed views about topics near his coronary heart similar to nature conservation, structure and genetically modified crops.

‘Unethical and un-Christian’

Reporting from London, Al Jazeera’s Nadeem Baba mentioned that the UK authorities may face additional authorized challenges to its plan.

“It may nonetheless be dealing with a wider judicial evaluation into whether or not Rwanda is actually a secure nation to ship susceptible folks,” he defined.

Worldwide human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson instructed Al Jazeera on Friday that the UK had a global authorized obligation to find out whether or not the folks dealing with deportation have been real asylum seekers fleeing persecution.

Sending asylum seekers to Rwanda was thought of “unethical and un-Christian” by many, Robertson mentioned from London, including that the authorized problem is much from over.

“It’s a really controversial coverage and it’s unsuitable that it ought to be determined in a day. It’s going to want, and I believe will obtain, a great deal extra consideration from the courts,” he mentioned.

UN officers and refugee teams have criticised the plan as unworkable and inhumane, saying these dealing with being despatched to Rwanda embrace folks fleeing Syria and Afghanistan who arrived within the UK throughout the English Channel on small boats.

Baba mentioned that the primary stage of the plan has concerned the UK paying greater than $150m to the Rwandan authorities, in hopes that the plan would deter folks from crossing the English Channel from France in small boats.

Greater than 28,000 migrants and asylum seekers entered the UK throughout the Channel final yr, up from 8,500 in 2020. Dozens have died, together with 27 folks in November when a single boat capsized.